law

23 Nov What are they saying about Michael and LabMD’s win?

Here’s a selection of quotes from Michael and LabMD’s win against the FTC.

Enjoy!

 

Screen Shot 2015-11-23 at 10.00.23 AMThe Wall Street Journal: “The Federal Trade Commission’s Data-Security Enforcement Efforts Have Received A Setback—At The Hands Of The Commission’s Own In-House Judge. Administrative Law Judge D. Michael Chappell late Friday dismissed a long-running and sometimes bitter case involving LabMD, a former medical testing  company the FTC accused of failing to provide reasonable or appropriate cybersecurity protections for patient data.”(Brent Kendall, “Federal Trade Commission Loses Data Security Ruling,” http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2015/11/16/federal-trade-commission-loses-data-security-ruling/tab/print/)

 

 

Screen Shot 2015-11-23 at 10.23.03 AM“In A Data Security Enforcement Action That Some Have Characterized As A Modern Version Of David Vs. Goliath, David Won Today, And The FTC Lost.It was an enforcement action that the FTC never should have commenced, as I’ve argued repeatedly, and today’s loss may actually make future enforcement actions more difficult for them as the standard for demonstrating likelihood of substantial injury has now been addressed in this ruling.”(Dissent, “FTC V. LabMD Ruling Issued: FTC Loses Data Security Enforcement Case,”Databreaches.Net, 11/13/15)

 

(more…)

Read More

21 Nov Michael Daugherty CEO of LabMD speaks for the first time after landmark FTC Ruling

 

Reblogged from here

Michael Daugherty Founder President and CEO of LabMD speaks to Government and IT Business Leaders for the first time after landmark court ruling at November 2015 GTRA Council Meeting.

 

GTRA November 17 2015 – Founder President and CEO of LabMD and author Michael Daugherty discussed his major win against the Federal Trade Commission at GTRA’s SecureGOV summit yesterday. After seven years of litigation court battles and testimonials ALJ ruled in favor of LabMD determining that the FTC failed to provide substantial evidence of any theft-related or emotional harm in the aftermath of an alleged security breach.

(more…)

Read More

28 Sep Closing Argument: The FTC dismisses their behavior as irrelevant

UN_logo_colors:invert

On September 16, 2015, closing arguments were held in FTC Administrative court in Washington, DC.

This is the court Congress created over a century ago. They allowed this court to be subject to FTC rules. Rules that are stacked way in the FTC’s favor. And because Congress created the beast there is very little the courts can do about what goes down here.

When you read the transcript you will immediately note the judge going after the FTC. You’ll note his frustration as he grapples with the fact that the FTC argues that their behavior before they sued LabMD is irrelevant.

Working with thieves, not cooperating with a congressional investigation, not verifying evidence, refusing to tell the court or the world what standards and rules exist for cybersecurity compliance, destroying a medical facility, allowing hearsay, recusing a commissioner, speaking to the press, knowingly relying on tainted evidence and still moving forward, and helping create a third party shell company to deceive the public….none of this matters.

At least until they want to use some of it to lie about LabMD.

And because they write the rules, stack the deck, and lie to win….they just might just get away with it. Morality and truth isn’t on the table here. Only shredded reality. Please think hard if this is who you want our government regulating cybersecurity.

The FTC IS CHOCKED FULL OF LAWYERS who don’t care what carnage they wreak on the backs of consumers.

Our cyberdefences are way down and that’s due to their bully idiocy.  Enjoy the show…but their tactics will not create a safer world.

May 5, 2015 PUBLIC Final Trial Transcript

Read More

17 Sep New Comic Strip Highlights The Story Of How Washington Caused A Successful Small Business To Close

Screen shot 2013-11-06 at 8.39.52 PM

 

Comic debuts as LabMD makes final arguments in its years-long legal battle against the Federal Trade Commission

 

 

WASHINGTON – Cause of Action, a nonpartisan strategic oversight group committed to ensuring that government decision-making is open, honest, and fair, is releasing a comic strip today outlining the case of LabMD vs. the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

 

Click here to view the full comic strip.

 

The FTC’s complaint against LabMD, a small, but successful cancer detection facility based in Georgia, relied on faulty allegations made by Tiversa, Inc., a data security company with a direct financial interest in FTC enforcement action against LabMD and others.

 

The toll of the lawsuit eventually destroyed LabMD, which is making closing arguments in the case today.

 

Cause of Action Executive Director Daniel Epstein issued the following statement:

 

“The comic is funny, but the sad reality is that this comic outlines a common example of what happens when the government colludes with crony companies to target the little guy. What may seem like a complicated and convoluted legal case is actually a very simple case of cronyism and federal overreach at its worst.”

 

Cause of Action is a non-profit, nonpartisan government accountability organization that fights to protect economic opportunity when federal regulations, spending and cronyism threaten it. For more information, visitwww.causeofaction.org.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: September 16, 2015

Media Contact: Geoff Holtzman | Geoff.holtzman@causeofaction.org | 703-405-3511

 

Read More

22 Jun The FTC Goes Whistling Past the Graveyard

photo

The FTC has decided not to oppose LabMD’s request for a criminal investigation into Tiversa’s behavior…AS THEY SPIT IN THE FACE OF JUSTICE. They have enabled crime, ignored evidence, and are now sitting on the sidelines. These are hypocritical tyrants as they boast they are out to protect consumers. Their energy is being spent on keeping their incompetent and corrupt culture under wraps.

Not this time.

Look at the facts.

It’s unbelievable but sadly true.

 

LabMD – Mtn Referral 6 19 15

Read More

10 May Bombshell Testimony as FTC Fails to Verify Evidence

Screen Shot 2015-05-10 at 7.13.02 PM

Grab your popcorn and turn off House of Cards because it doesn’t get better than this.

The testimony of former Tiversa employee Rick Wallace is bombshell transparent testimony.

It took over a year to get Rick on the stand with criminal immunity. This is no “he said she said” game, criminal immunity isn’t easily approved by the Justice Department, but the consistency and forensic evidence provided to Chairman Darreell Issa and the Justice Department must have done the trick.

Tsk Tsk Tsk, if the FTC had only verified evidence before embarking on their shameless seek and destroy fishing expedition.

Download it if you like…and grab a highlighter.

May 5, 2015 PUBLIC Final Trial Transcript

Screen Shot 2015-05-10 at 7.21.05 PM

Read More

07 May Whistleblower accuses cybersecurity company of extorting clients – CNN Money

photo

As reported in CNN Money today by   @Jose_Pagliery

A cybersecurity company faked hacks and extorted clients to buy its services, according to an ex-employee.
In a federal court this week, Richard Wallace, a former investigator at cybersecurity company Tiversa, said the company routinely engaged in fraud — and mafia-style shakedowns.

To scare potential clients, Tiversa would typically make up fake data breaches, Wallace said. Then it pressured firms to pay up.
“Hire us or face the music,” Wallace said on Tuesday at a federal courtroom in Washington, D.C.

CNNMoney obtained a transcript of the hearing.

The results were disastrous for at least one company that stood up to Tiversa and refused to pay.

In 2010, Tiversa scammed LabMD, a cancer testing center in Atlanta, Wallace testified. Wallace said he tapped into LabMD’s computers and pulled the medical records.

The cybersecurity firm then alerted LabMD it had been hacked. Tiversa offered it emergency “incident response” cybersecurity services. After the lab refused the offer, Tiversa threatened to tip off federal regulators about the “data breach.”

When LabMD still refused, Tiversa let the Federal Trade Commission know about the “hack.”

The FTC went after the lab, giving the company a choice: sign a consent decree (basically a plea deal which means years of audits and a nasty public statement) or fight in court. The CEO of LabMD, Michael Daugherty, chose to fight, because a plea deal would have tarnished his reputation and killed the business anyway, he said.

Daugherty lost that battle in 2014, having run out of steam. The lawsuit killed LabMD, which was forced to fire its 40 employees last year.

“We were a small company,” he said. “It’s not like we had millions of dollars to fight this and tons of employees.”

“The fight with the government was psychological warfare,” he told CNNMoney. “There was reputation assassination. There was intimidation. We thought we were extorted. My staff and management team was demoralized. My VP left. My lawyer left.”

Daugherty launched a website and wrote a book about the ordeal. Cause of Action, a government watchdog group, picked up his case.

Wallace’s testimony casts doubt on the FTC’s case against LabMD. If Wallace is telling the truth, the FTC aggressively prosecuted a company based on bogus evidence.

The FTC declined to comment, citing an ongoing lawsuit against LabMD, which still hasn’t reached its conclusion.

LabMD wasn’t the first time Tiversa’s false hacks made national news, Wallace said. He claimed that Tiversa also made up information in 2009 pointing to Iran for supposedly stealing blueprints for President Obama’s helicopter, Marine One. That scare that led to several news stories published byNBC, Fox, CNET and others.

According to Wallace, Tiversa did this by using phony IP addresses — on the orders of Tiversa’s CEO, Bob Boback. The company, which works closely with law enforcement, would look up the Internet addresses that were used by known criminals or identity thieves, then claim that those IP addresses were sharing stolen files online. Wallace said it was a scare tactic that added “spread” to the supposed damage — and “wow factor.”

“So, to boil this down, you would make the data breach appear to be much worse than it actually had been?” FTC Administrative Judge Michael Chappell asked.

“That’s correct,” Wallace responded.

Tiversa denies Wallace’s allegations. On Thursday, Tiversa’s CEO told CNNMoney that the recent revelations were “baseless” and came from an ex-employee still angry for being fired.

“This is an overblown case of a terminated employee seeking revenge,” Boback said. “Tiversa has received multiple awards from law enforcement for our continued efforts to help support them in cyber activities.”

Tiversa is a small cybersecurity consultancy based in Pittsburgh. Its board members include several highly-decorated experts in the security and privacy fields, including the retired four-star U.S. Army General Wesley K. Clark (formerly NATO’s Supreme Allied Commander in Europe) and Larry Ponemon (founder of the Ponemon Institute, a pro-privacy think tank).

U.S. Rep. Darrell Issa, chairman of the House Oversight Committee, demanded last year that the FTC look into allegations of “corporate blackmail” by Tiversa. In a letter to the FTC in December, Issa noted that Tiversa assisted the FTC on data leak investigations of “nearly 100 companies.” This link potentially taints evidence in those cases too.

To see the original article, click HERE

Read More

06 May Analyst Backs LabMD In FTC Row, Alleges Fraud At Tiversa

image

Originally posted on Law 360

By Jimmy Hoover

Screen shot 2014-08-22 at 5.55.03 AM

Law360, Washington (May 05, 2015, 9:16 PM ET) — LabMD Inc. on Tuesday scored a major hit in its data security fight with the Federal Trade Commission after a former analyst at the cybersecurity firm Tiversa Inc. testified that his company lied to the agency about the extent of LabMD’s data leaks after the medical testing firm turned down its services.

Richard E. Wallace said in a hearing that during his time as one of the company’s chief forensic analysts from 2007 to 2014, he helped Tiversa and CEO Robert J. Boback spin lies to the FTC about the “proliferation” of LabMD-held insurance records among identity thieves — which LabMD claims is the sole basis for the agency’s 2013 administrative complaint against it for alleged data protection failures.

Wallace said that, rather than a proliferation, he merely downloaded a file off of LabMD’s own server and manufactured those claims per Boback’s orders, who he said wanted to steer LabMD into using Tiversa’s monitoring and remedial services.

According to Wallace, Boback became infuriated that LabMD’s president and CEO, Michael J. Daugherty, rejected their services.

“[Boback] basically said F-him, make sure he’s at the top of the list,” Wallace said at the hearing, describing the Tiversa CEO’s reaction to LabMD’s refusal of services.

Atlanta-based LabMD conducts laboratory tests on samples that physicians obtain from patients and also performs medical testing for consumers around the country.

Tuesday’s proceedings before Administrative Law Judge D. Michael Chappell had stalled for several months after Wallace revealed that Tiversa had emerged as the subject of an investigation from the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform and that he was pursuing immunity for his testimony in the FTC proceedings — immunity he finally received.

Wallace said that he left the company in February 2014 after Boback had pressured him to lie under oath in a planned deposition from LabMD’s attorneys about the extent of LabMD’s data leaks.

According to LabMD’s attorney Reed Rubinstein of Dinsmore & Shohl LLP, the testimony marked a “remarkable day” in the case and vindicated the company’s assertion that “the FTC action was based on manufactured evidence.” At the close of the hearing Tuesday, Rubenstein announced that LabMD will seek a criminal investigation against the Tiversa.

“Obviously the FTC never checked what came in from Tiversa,” Rubinstein said in an interview with Law360.

Under direct examination from William A. Sherman II of Dinsmore & Shohl, Wallace outlined a pattern of fraud and deception at his former company and said it was “common practice” at Tiversa to deceive companies into believing identity thieves had stolen their files off of peer-to-peer networks in an effort to charge for remedial services.

Wallace said Tiversa carried out the scheme by inserting the IP addresses of known identity thieves into a “data store” and making it appear to the companies that the identity thieves had pilfered their files, despite the fact that they had already been shut down by law enforcement. Because their computers were down, Wallace said, “there was no way to contradict what Tiversa was saying.”

During a re-direct examination Tuesday from his own attorney, Mary Beth Buchanan of Bryan Cave LLP, Wallace also recounted an episode in which Boback allegedly forced him to conjure up a report claiming that trade secrets related to the avionics found in the cockpit of Marine One, the helicopter for presidential transport, had been stolen by Iranian nationals — a fake story later plastered in headlines across major news outlets including, CBS News, NBC News and Fox News.

“It was very big press for Tiversa. And believe it or not, it was not easy to find an active Iranian IP address that law enforcement couldn’t get a hold of,” Wallace said.

The FTC declined an opportunity to depose as well as cross-examine Wallace on Tuesday, though FTC attorney Laura Riposo VanDruff indicated that she may file a motion to introduce a rebuttal witness within the next week.

Counsel for Tiversa and Boback could not be immediately reached Tuesday for comment.

LabMD is represented by William A. Sherman II, Reed Rubinstein and Sunni Harris of Dinsmore & Shohl LLP and Hallee Morgan, Kent Huntington, Daniel Epstein, Patrick Massari and Prashant K. Khetan of Cause of Action.

The FTC is represented by Alain Sheer, Laura Riposo VanDruff, Megan Cox, Ryan Mehm, John Krebs and Jarad Brown.

The case is In the Matter of LabMD Inc., docket number 9357, before the Federal Trade Commission Office of the Administrative Law Judges.

–Editing by Emily Kokoll.

To download your own copy of this article, click here

Read More